🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several European nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in other EU countries